With massive immigration and free rein on self-terminating pregnancies, one cant help but think if the conspiracy theories are true

In March 2026, the BBC announced: "Peers in the House of Lords have backed plans to decriminalize abortions, which MPs voted in favour of last summer."

Immediately, and following demonstrations in front of the House of Lords, people went into a fury on social networks, accusing the government of the UK of legalizing abortions up to nine months, that is to say until the birth of the child. And many, as it has been a trend for some time, went of course as far as to accuse their elites of Satanism.

Reuters was quick to react, invoking its fact-checking duty: "Misleading. The House of Lords backed moves to remove women from criminal prosecution related to abortion, not to change existing legal restrictions on healthcare professionals regarding abortion performed after 24 weeks gestation."

Still according to the BBC, the Archbishop Sarah Mullally reacted: "Though its intention may not be to change the 24 week abortion limit, it undoubtedly risks eroding the safeguards and enforcement of those legal limits and inadvertently undermining the value of human life." Indeed!

The problem with Reuter's fact-checkers is that they read the original text of British MPs but do not question the logic. Maybe because they have none. But certainly because their duty is to legitimize the agenda. Isn't to "decriminalize" a kind of synonym for "making it legal"? If, let's say, a person walks in the street with weed or crack and isn't facing any sort of punishment as it is not a criminal offense anymore, isn't the person acting absolutely legally or at least being tolerated? Well, the same goes with abortions. Women, voluntarily or being psychologically manipulated, will be able to terminate their pregnancies at any moment. The nuance apparently being that they'll do it at home, not at the hospital. Abortions are always a traumatic and dreadful experience, but just imagine what it would look like at eight months in a crap apartment of some London suburb. In 2025 already, a British woman who took abortion medicine at home when she was 26 weeks pregnant (before delivering the dead baby to a hospital in a backpack) was cleared by the court. All this seems to be pure madness. Or controlled anarchy.

Pro-choice advocates will always argue that women are free to control their pregnancies and fertility, that a child is anyway a person only after birth, the first breath, etc. At some point, I don't know, they'll probably argue that a child isn't a person until he reaches the age of reason. Here, I'd like to mention a bit of Asian wisdom: in traditional East Asian reckoning, the age of an individual is calculated from conception, not from birth. You are considered one year old when born. That's a different perception of life in itself: a liberal view according to which the individual governs nature versus a traditional view that accepts the reality of nature.

But there's also a difference in the political perception of the issue. While most countries are enduring demographic problems, some decide to encourage procreation, some to discourage. The famous Chinese one-child policy is certainly the best historical symbol of demographic control. Now, they have to reverse the trend. In Russia, where fertility rate is dangerously low, a woman seeking to go through an abortion or expressing her wish not to have kids is advised to see a therapist. However, though everybody says that Western Europe's fertility rate is also too low, France has "proudly" enshrined abortion in its Constitution in 2024 and it's now the UK that leads the way when it comes to permissiveness in allowing its female population to get rid of their successors.

Yes, their successors in life on the land of their ancestors. Meanwhile, and despite Brexit, which turned out to be a complete failure, the UK has been massively taking in migrants, mainly from "non EU-countries" (with a peak under Boris Johnson's government, known as the "Boriswave"). This euphemism, "non-EU countries", doesn't fool anybody, of course. The top three nationalities in 2025 were Nigerian, Indian and Pakistani. Those incoming populations have a completely different understanding of life, and thus of procreation. The newcomers are way less likely to engage in abortion, let alone into late abortion. Extreme feminism is not their cup of tea, liberalism is not their milk. And to think that they'll adapt to British standard is totally delusional.

Unsurprisingly, the recent decades have proved it. But the authorities keep taking in those populations. The definition of insanity. Or is it, really? Maybe the insanity is to keep going in this direction while assuring the public that the Great Replacement theory is utter conspiracy delirium, as every single thing they do validates and reinforces the theory.

A society that does not consider its kids the utmost priority is either criminal or suicidal. In light of the Epstein scandal in which members of the government and the nobility are entangled, this new attack on childhood can only convince people that their elites are dangerous psychopaths.

(RT.com)